Thursday, 1 July 2021

The Righteous Mind. Why Good People are divided by Politics and Religion by Jonathan Haidt. 💙💜💖💗

I got this book to help me understand about the culture battles I see around on public and social media. Perhaps, because I haven’t been a regular user for years, I am able to catch only fragmented narratives which I struggle to put together. I have a list of other books to read but I decided to start with this one, because, first, I found it in my local bookshop and second, I thought that instead of reading about ideologies and positions I should first understand humans nature. The Righteous Mind tries to explain why we struggle to get along, understand and respect a diversity of political positions, from a biological point of view to psychological and sociological perspectives. 

The book is divided in three parts following the 3 Principles of Moral Psychology: 1) Intuitions come first, Reasoning second 2) There is More to Morality than Harm and Fairness 3) Morality Binds and Blinds. 

In part 1 Haidt explains how we form our judgements. Having carried out numerous psychological experiments to test reactions to harmless but offensive situations he concludes that the parts of the brain which manage our Intuitions (triggered by disgust, disrespect, etc.) are the first ones to react, deciding whether we like something or not. The Reasoning aspect of our Moral Judgement comes after, not to scrutinize or correct but to confirm. Haidt compares Intuitions and Reasoning with a Small Rider on an Elephant. When the elephant (Intuitions) leans toward one side of an argument the Rider leans with it, and it is hard, if not impossible to change the elephants way. Having said that, Haidt also states that cultures influence our morals. He defines 3 Clusters of Moral Themes: Ethics of autonomy predominant in educated, individualistic, western societies, Ethics of Community and Divinity predominant in the rest of the world and which give people a wider spectrum of morals foundations. Finally, Haidt defines a Social Intuitionist model which states that in order to influence other people we have to aim to their elephant, that is their intuitions not their reasoning.

In part 2 Haidt presents his Moral Foundations Theory which defines 5 moral foundations which are innate to humans. This is a pluralistic approach to morality, that is, it is not based on 1 single rule but many. The initial 5 Moral Foundations are: Care/Harm, Fairness/Cheating, Loyalty/Betrayal, Authority/Subversion and Sanctity/Degradation. Later, after several studies, he added a sixth foundation: Liberty/Oppression. In a separate chapter Haidt discusses the first 5 foundations in the context of US politics and based on his test based studies. He arrives at 2 conclusions. First is that both extremes of the political spectrum rely on different combinations of the foundations. For Haidt Left Wing or Progressive rely primarily on the Care/Harm, the Fairness/Cheating and Liberty/Oppression foundations, whereas the Conservatives rely on all 5. From this he concludes that Progressive are at a disadvantage compared to Conservatives as the latter are able to appeal to a wider range of moralities.

Part 3 includes discussions about why humans are so groupish. Haidt discusses Darwin, individual and group level selection and opposes Dawkins view that we are selfish beings. Haidt says human culture has evolved alongside our genes. He presents some studies which show how behaviour could be adapted with breeding control in foxes for individual changes and with chickens for group changes. He then discusses the role of religion in our cultures and how they have been an important factor to keep communities alive. He doesn’t discuss or support religious dogma but their capacity to bring people together under shared moral foundations. The final chapter was my least favourite perhaps because it was too much embedded into the US political landscape. One thing I appreciate though is the authors sincerity in briefly relating his personal journey and how his own studies have affected his personal political position. Anyway, this was a great read to me. It opened my eyes to dimensions of morality I have never considered and most importantly it has given me much food for thought.

Negatives: Endnotes instead of Footnotes.

Friday, 25 June 2021

Strangers on a Train by Patricia Highsmith. 👍👍👍👍🧐

Bruno and Guy meet on a train. Bruno interrogates Guy about his live but Guy isn't interested. Bruno insists and Guy tells him about his divorce. Bruno in turn tells Guy about the money his father doesn't want to give him. Everything is fine until Bruno proposes a murder swap. A brilliant psychological thriller with two excellent characters.

Sunday, 20 June 2021

The Horla by Guy de Maupassant. 😱😱😱😱

I could finally read The Horla. Been meaning to read Maupassant for years and then I got this Canterbury Classics edition three years ago. I had to wait until page 324 because I'm reading the stories in order. 😬 I enjoyed the atmosphere but what I enjoyed the most was the journey into the protagonist's mind, into his decline into madness. Loved Maupassant's prose so I'll probably be reading more of his work.

Wednesday, 16 June 2021

The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch by Philip K. Dick.

An interesting and weird read. The synopsis reads: “In the overcrowded world and cramped space colonies of the late 21st century, tedium can be endured through the use of the drug Can-D, which enables the user to inhabit a shared illusory world. When industrialist Palmer Eldritch returns from an interstellar trip, he brings with him a new drug, Chew-Z, which is far more potent than Can-D, but threatens to plunge the world into a permanent state of drugged illusion controlled by the mysterious Eldritch.” Palmer Eldritch is the centre of attention of the story but in fact he is not the protagonist. He is a mystery because of his motivations and his nature. The book follows the life and tribulations of Barney Mayerson, a pre-fash consultant or a precog (someone who can see the future) and his boss Leo Bulero. Bulero owns a company which distributes virtual landscapes and in the background distributes Can-D. When Eldritch arrives with Chew-Z they try to eliminate the competition. 

 The book is divided in 2 parts. The first part introduces Mayerson, Bulero and Roni Fugate (Mayerson’s assistant), the legal product they sell and the Can-D problematic around the space colonies. This part reads like a normal novel. The second part starts when one of the characters consumes Chew-Z. Then life turns into a mixture of delusions and reality. From then on the reader doesn’t know what is happening under the influence of the drug and what not. What takes place under a simulation and what is real. It is under these circumstances that Eldritch comes to the surface. We don’t know if he is human, an alien or a god. Towards the end, the topics of religion and gods gain prominence with some characters questioning their existence in a world where there is no hope without a drug.

I first learned about this novel when I read How We Became Posthuman… by Katherine Hayles. Hayles writes about Dick’s novel (p178) in connection with the concept of the Schizoid Android (an unfeeling female) a kind of prototype for a posthuman and compares Roni Fugate to Rachel the android in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? The schizoid android appears in several of Dick's books as a woman with black hair. Apparently Dick based his schizoid creations on his emotionally cold, detached mother.

Friday, 11 June 2021

Sapiens. A Brief History of Human Kind by Yuval Noah Harari. 🌟🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟

Mindblowing. Very well written. Dense with information and theories but light to read. Sapiens is history but is not filled only with information like dates, place and names. I loved Sapiens for the way it uses a theoretical framework based on the idea that Sapiens rule the world because they believe in things that don't exist (such as money, states, religions and human rights) to explain How and Why humans have developed (and evolved) the way we are. It doesn't read like an academic book though. Instead it tells stories. It uses tools from biology, anthropology, economics, and others areas of knowledge to draw a ginormous picture of what we were, what we are now and guess (more than a guess, Informed Estimations of Possibilities?) what is coming next for us. Totally recommend it!!

Saturday, 29 May 2021

Planet of Exile by Ursula K Le Guin. ❤ 🤍 💙

Hundreds of years ago an expedition from the League of all Worlds arrived on a planet inhabited by humans resembling nomad hunter gatherers. The expedition left and took with it all of their technology. However a few people were left who had to accommodate to the new planet. Years and generations go by, and the locals haven't evolved their tools or technology much. The descendants of the expeditioners have lost touch with their home, barely keeping track of their origins by books and stories. They keep apart from the locals and think of themselves as exiles, still following the Law of the League which forces them to live like the locals. The story follows a local tribe and the expedition which are forced to work together to defend themselves from an attack of a barbarian northern tribe. I liked this novel more than Rocannon's World. The story is much more engaging and Le Guin builds a richer world, rasing issues such as racism, fear of the unknown, superstitions, technology (or the lack of), isolation and others.

Wednesday, 26 May 2021

Mildred Pierce by James M Cain

This novel was a surprise to me. As it came in the same volume with The Postman always rings twice and Double Indemnity I thought this was going to be another noir, crime novel, but it wasn't. I googled it and got "hardboiled novel" but to me it felt like a drama with a dark twist. There were no detectives or crimes but a couple of excellent female characters not always doing the right thing. Mildred Pierce is the name of the protagonist, a middle class housewife who, after a divorce, has to work to support her family. Set in the 1930 in California, USA, Mrs Pierce is a rarity. A successful, independent working, single woman. She is a fully fleshed out character showing resilience, commitment and ambition. But she is not a saint. Her struggles with her daughter Veda give the story a dark tone, which I enjoyed. Veda is detestable, capricious, manipulative with a personality disorder it seemed. Loved her. She is to blame for a couple of plot twists in the second half of the novel. While I liked Double Indemnity more, I think this novel is worth reading for its depiction of credible, complex women and the exploration of daughter-mother relationship.